DNP810 Case Report You will be creating a case report in stages over four course topics. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or own

DNP810 Case Report You will be creating a case report in stages over four course topics. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or own personal/family; however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice hours and therefore not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy. Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you and/or the organization in which you practice may specialize in treating.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Include the following:

Guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy).
The role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism).
The role and involvement family plays into the health care decision.

Directions:

For this assignment (Part 1 of the Case Report), write a 1,000-1,250 word paper incorporating genetics information learned from assigned readings in Topics 1 and 2. Include the following:

Describe the disease, its prevalence, and its incidence.
Discuss the laboratory testing that is possible.

You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.

Topic 1: Genetics and Genomics in Medicine

Topic 2: Genetic Sequence and Genetic Testing Course Code
DNP-810
Class Code
DNP-810-IO1240
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Discussion of the Guidelines and Reasons Behind
the FDA Regulations for Introducing New
Pharmaceutical Agents (Policy)
10.0%
Discussion of the Role That Money and Grants
Play In Scientific Advances the Economics of
Health Care (Capitalism)
10.0%
Discussion of the Role and Involvement Family
Plays in Health Care Decisions
10.0%
Description of the Disease, Its Prevalence, and Its
Incidence
20.0%
Discussion of the Possible Laboratory Testing
20.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Research Citations (In-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference
page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Case Report: Part 1
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA
regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents
(policy) is not present.
Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific
advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is not
present.
Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health
care decisions is not presented.
The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are not
described.
Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is not present.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
50.0
Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA
regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents
(policy) is present but incomplete.
Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific
advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is
present but incomplete.
Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health
care decisions is presented but incomplete.
The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described.
Discussion is incomplete.
Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but
incomplete.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, and/or word choice are present.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA
regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents
(policy) is present but done at a perfunctory level.
Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific
advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is
present but done at a perfunctory level.
Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health
care decisions is presented but done at a perfunctory level.
The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described.
Discussion is done at a perfunctory level.
Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but
done at a perfunctory level.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure
and audience-appropriate language are used.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA
regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents
(policy) is clearly present and convincing. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific
advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly
present and convincing. Information presented is from
scholarly though dated sources.
Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health
care decisions is clearly presented and convincing.
Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but
some outdated sources are used.
The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly
described. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is
from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are
used.
Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present
and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current
scholarly but some outdated sources are used.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth
progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA
regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents
(policy) is clearly present and insightful. Information
presented is from current scholarly sources.
Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific
advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly
present and insightful. Information presented is from current
scholarly sources.
Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health
care decisions is clearly presented, insightful and detailed.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly
described. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information
presented is from current scholarly sources.
Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present
and insightful. Information presented is from current
scholarly sources.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of
the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Comments
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment