JUS 261 SNHU The Judicial Administration Section For Milestone Two, submit a draft of the Judicial Administration section of your final project, the scenar

JUS 261 SNHU The Judicial Administration Section For Milestone Two, submit a draft of the Judicial Administration section of your final project, the scenario analysis. In your draft, you will analyze the impact of judicial administration components, calendaring and docketing, and the roles of court staff and litigation participants.To complete this assignment, review the Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric document and the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document. JUS 261 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
For Milestone Two, you will submit a draft of the Judicial Administration section of your scenario analysis. Using your assigned reading, course materials, and the
scenario provided below (the same scenario that you worked on in Milestone One and will use for the final project) you will analyze the impact of judicial
administration components—calendaring and docketing, and the roles of court staff and litigation participants.
Scenario
Jed, Herman, and Jane live in Washington, D.C. Jed and Jane entered the local bank and took $65,000. Jed and Herman both used shotguns during the robbery,
though no one was hurt. Jane drove the getaway vehicle. Two hours later, as they headed toward the Canadian border, they were stopped by the police for
speeding and taken into custody. The police determined that Jed and Jane matched the eyewitness descriptions of the robbers. Jane confessed their bank
robbery scheme. Jed and Herman denied their involvement. The police only recovered $25,000 in cash, but were unable to determine if the recovered money
was taken from the bank. The police determined that Jed was a convicted felon at the time of the armed bank robbery. The local police and FBI were involved in
the investigation.
The defense attorneys for each defendant (Jed, Herman, Jane) request a continuance for four months to sift through the evidence. The prosecution objects and
argues that the delay would significantly clog the court’s already heavy workload. In the alternative, the prosecution argues that if the court grants a
continuance, then the prosecution should be allowed to prolong turning over the remaining discovery. The defense attorneys object and argue that this hinders
their effective representation of their clients and would hinder a prompt resolution. The defense attorneys further argue that their clients deserve a well
prepared and thorough defense. The judge currently has trials blocked over the next 10 months and wants to try the case now.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
II. Judicial Administration
A. Analyze how federal, state, and local courts calendar and docket cases. Are these processes effective in promoting efficiency? Defend your
response.
B. Describe how the calendaring and continuance of this scenario would be handled differently in the state system versus the federal system.
Defend your response.
C. Identify the key role within federal and state judicial systems that most impacts process. How does this role aid in creating and maintaining an
efficient and effective judicial process?
F. Determine the impact of venue on process efficiency in this scenario. Defend your response.
G. Explain how a four month continuance affects the efficiency of any court under the circumstances presented in the scenario. Defend your
response.
Guidelines for Submission: Milestone Two must be two to three pages in length with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and APA formatting.
Critical Elements
Judicial Administration:
Calendar and Docket
Proficient (100%)
Analyzes how federal, state, and local
courts calendar and docket cases and
establishes their impact on efficiency
Judicial Administration:
Calendaring
Describes how the calendaring and
continuance of this case would be
handled in the state and federal judicial
systems and defends response
Judicial Administration:
Key Role
Identifies key role within federal and
state judicial systems, and establishes
how each aids in maintaining an efficient
and effective judicial system
Determines the impact of venue on
process efficiency in this scenario and
defends response
Identifies the effects of a continuance
on a court, explains the impact on a
court’s efficiency, and defends response
Judicial Administration:
Impact of Venue
Judicial Administration:
Continuance
Articulation of Response
Submission has no major errors related
to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization
Needs Improvement (75%)
Analyzes how federal, state, and local
courts calendar and docket cases but
does not establish their impact on
efficiency
Describes how the calendaring and
continuance of this case would be
handled in the state or federal judicial
systems but does not defend response
or response is lacking detail or
inaccurate
Identifies key role within federal and
state judicial systems, but does not
establish how each aids in maintaining
an efficient and effective judicial system
Determines the impact of venue on
process efficiency in this scenario, but
does not defend response
Identifies the effects of a continuance
on a court but does not explain the
impact on a court’s efficiency or does
not defend response
Submission has major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that negatively impact
readability and articulation of main
ideas
Not Evident (0%)
Does not analyze how courts calendar and
docket cases
Value
18
Does not describe how the calendaring of
this case would be handled in the state or
federal judicial systems
18
Does not identify key role within federal
and state judicial systems
18
Does not determine the impact of venue
on process efficiency
18
Does not identify the effects of a
continuance on a court
18
Submission has critical errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that prevent understanding
of ideas
10
Earned Total
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment