ECON 302 OP ED Response I have to write an OP ED response for economics 302. I have attached the assignment criteria and here is the link to the op ed http

ECON 302 OP ED Response I have to write an OP ED response for economics 302. I have attached the assignment criteria and here is the link to the op ed https://fee.org/articles/gdp-economics-fat-or-muscle/. You have to respond to this op ed. It has to be 2 paragraphs one being the summary and the other one stating what u liked about this op ed and what u didn’t. . Helpful vs. Unhelpful Op-ed Comments
In the 4th paragraph of the op-ed, you cite
(source X) in defense of (argument Y). One
weakness in this argument is (well thought
out point Z) that is mentioned in (source A).
In order for (argument Y) to be convincing,
this alternative (point Z) must be dealt with.
Personally, the introduction did not cause me
to be interested in reading the rest of the oped. One way the introduction could be more
compelling is by discussing how the main
idea of the op-ed relates to (current issue X).
Here is a link to an article that discusses
(current issue X).
As I read your op-ed, I was initially confused
because you started with your opinion and
evidence before I as the reader really
understood what the issue is about. It could
be helpful to provide more context. For
example, you could consider moving the 4th
paragraph in front of the current 2nd
paragraph.
Currently, your op-ed has several long, runon sentences. For example, this run-on
sentence in paragraph 5 (quote the sentence),
could be split into two sentences. Also, pay
more attention to capitalizing proper nouns.
For example, throughout the paper, none of
the countries mentioned are capitalized.
I agree with your well-reasoned and clear
opinion. Although I find your support
convincing, (evidence X) is another piece of
evidence that could make your argument
even more convincing.
This is a terrible op-ed. I disagree with what
you are trying to argue for. The reasons you
provide are weak. You are weak. The
source you cite in defense of your argument
is biased. You are biased.
Your introduction was boring. You should
fix that.
Your op-ed is structured strangely.
Everything is out of order and it makes it
really hard to read.
Your writing is terrible. You have lots of
spelling and grammatical errors. Your
writing style also sucks.
You are such an amazing writer and every
word of your op-ed is brilliantly composed.
There is absolutely no possible way in
which your op-ed could be improved. Great
job.
Each op-ed response should contain a summary paragraph. This paragraph demonstrates that the
critic has understood the op-ed and signals that the critic is in a position to provide good
feedback.
After the summary paragraph, each op-ed response should contain at least two substantial and
thoughtful constructive comments. See the above table for examples of helpful vs. unhelpful
comments.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment