BUS385 CBU Criticism Of American With Disabilities Act ADA You can pick one topic from the Power Point attached The Research Paper shall not exceed fiv
BUS385 CBU Criticism Of American With Disabilities Act ADA You can pick one topic from the Power Point attached
The Research Paper shall not exceed five (5) pages in length not including the title page, abstract and references. BE AWARE, it is far more difficult to write a quality paper that is shorter in length. To help achieve the highest grade possible, before writing your paper, please assure that you have (1) carefully researched the issue to be studied (at least seven (7) scholarly or academic resources should be consulted, considering both sides of the issue identified); (2) carefully analyzed the pertinent issue; (3) removed any excess or unneeded verbiage; (4) proofread the paper for proper grammatical structure, (5) clearly, articulately, and concisely addressed the issue raised (this will require considerable time and thought on each student’s part); and (6) is formatted per APA guidelines. The Research Paper will emphasize CRITICAL THINKING, and will require incorporating into the analysis of the issue identified the various concepts discussed in class, in outside readings, and in the textbook.
(Week 8). 100 points.
Course Objective(s): All.
Below is the rubric your work will be scored against:
Performance
Levels
Dimensions &
(CLO/SLO Addressed)
Exemplary (4)
Accomplished (3)
Developing (2)
Beginning (1)
Dimension 1:Identification of Legal, Ethical, and Biblical Issues
CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3
SLO – – 1.1, 1.2, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.4
Correctly identifies all legal, ethical, and Biblical issues presented without error.
Identifies most legal, ethical, and Biblical issues with minor errors.
Identifies some issues. Multiple issues are not identified and/or identification contains multiple errors
Does not identify issues and/or paper contains multiple errors and/or major errors.
Dimension 2: Statement of Legal Regulations
CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3
SLO – – 1.1, 1.2, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4
Correctly states all applicable legal regulations without error.
Correctly states most applicable legal regulations with minor errors.
States some legal regulations. Multiple regulations are missing and/or stated with multiple errors.
Does not identify legal regulations and/or paper contains multiple errors and/or major errors.
Dimension 3:
Analysis of Legal, Ethical, and Biblical Issues
CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3
SLO – – 1.1, 1.2, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4
Analyzes all legal, ethical, and Biblical issues from an objective viewpoint, using the facts and rules of law to guide analysis.
Analyzes most legal, ethical, and Biblical issues from an objective viewpoint. Uses some facts and/or rules of law to guide analysis.
Analyzes some issues, mainly from only one viewpoint. Facts and/or rules of law are not a driving force of analysis.
The analysis does not take competing viewpoints into account. Facts and/or rules of law are used sparingly or not at all.
Dimension 4:
Articulation of Conclusion
CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.1, 2.1, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3
SLO – – 1.1, 1.2, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4
Directly articulates conclusion in an organized, logical manner. Gives an exemplary demonstration of how and why analysis supports a conclusion.
Directly articulates conclusion. The conclusion shows minor errors in organization and/or logic. Gives a competent demonstration of how and why analysis supports a conclusion.
The conclusion is conveyed to the reader but is not directly stated. Gives competent but flaws demonstration of how and why analysis supports a conclusion.
The conclusion is not directly stated, nor presented in an organized, logical manner. Does not demonstrate how analysis supports a conclusion.
Dimension 5:Writing/APA Formatting
CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4
SLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8
Formal, mature, polished, and scholarly academic voice is present. Paper is well organized, error-free, effective, and professional in strict APA format
Clear and competent academic voice with occasional errors.
Competent, developing academic voice and/or multiple errors.
Informal voice with consistent errors. BUS 525
LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUS.
AND MANAGEMENT
RESEARCH PAPER
CRITICAL ASSIGNMENT
Prof. April Frisby
Topics-Choose ONE*
Topic 1:
The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted
in 1990 to prohibit discrimination and guarantee that
people with disabilities have the same opportunities as
everyone else to participate in American life—
employment opportunities, to purchase goods and
services, and to participate in State and local
government programs and services. (www.ada.gov)
The ADA has been criticized that it lowers employment
opportunities for the disabled and increases the costs
of doing business which is particularly detrimental to
small businesses. Please address each of these criticisms
(including addressing arguments for and against each
criticism) and if either (or both) are realistic criticisms,
the benefit of the ADA overall in light of such criticisms.
Topic 2:
Religious discrimination involves treating a person (an applicant or employee)
unfavorably because of his or her religious beliefs. The law forbids discrimination
when it comes to any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job
assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, and any other term or
condition of employment.
It is illegal to harass a person because of his or her religion. However, the rules
for what constitutes harassment are not that clear-cut. Harassment can
include, for example, offensive remarks about a person’s religious beliefs or
practices. Although the law doesn’t prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments,
or isolated incidents that aren’t very serious, harassment is illegal when it is so
frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or
when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being
fired or demoted). (Source EEOC).
Develop a proposed solution to this problem that takes into account the view
that businesses and their employees need a bright line rule to determine if
behavior is legal or not. If you like, you may decide to develop a position to the
effect that there is no solution to the problem and that we have no choice but
to work on a case by case basis (please be sure to consider the issues with this
position).
*The views presented in the topics do not necessarily represent those of the
instructor and are presented for discussion/research paper purposes only.
The Research Paper shall not exceed five (5) pages in length
not including the title page, abstract and references. BE
AWARE, it is far more difficult to write a quality paper that is
shorter in length.
To help achieve the highest grade possible, before writing
your paper, please assure that you have (1) carefully
researched the issue to be studied (at least seven (7) scholarly
or academic resources should be consulted, considering both
sides of the issue identified); (2) carefully analyzed the
pertinent issue; (3) removed any excess or unneeded
verbiage; (4) proofread the paper for proper grammatical
structure, (5) clearly, articulately, and concisely addressed the
issue raised (this will require considerable time and thought on
each student’s part); and (6) is formatted per APA guidelines.
The Research Paper will emphasize CRITICAL THINKING, and
will require incorporating into the analysis of the issue
identified the various concepts discussed in class, in outside
readings, and in the textbook. 100 points.
Rubric
Performance
Levels
Dimensions &
(CLO/SLO Addressed)
Dimension
1: Identification of Legal,
Ethical, and Biblical Issues
CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.1,
2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3
SLO – – 1.1, 1.2, 5.2, 5.3,
5.4, 5.4
Dimension 2: Statement of
Legal Regulations
CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.1,
2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3
SLO – – 1.1, 1.2, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4
Exemplary (4)
Accomplished (3)
Developing (2)
Beginning (1)
Correctly identifies
all legal, ethical,
and Biblical issues
presented without
error.
Identifies most
legal, ethical, and
Biblical issues with
minor errors.
Identifies some
issues. Multiple issues
are not identified
and/or identification
contains multiple
errors
Does not identify
issues and/or
paper contains
multiple errors
and/or major
errors.
Correctly states all
applicable legal
regulations without
error.
Correctly states
most applicable
legal regulations
with minor errors.
States some legal
regulations. Multiple
regulations are
missing and/or stated
with multiple errors.
Does not identify
legal regulations
and/or paper
contains multiple
errors and/or
major errors.
Rubric Continued
Dimension 3:
Analysis of Legal,
Ethical, and Biblical
Issues
CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2,
3.3
SLO – – 1.1, 1.2, 5.2,
5.3, 5.4
Analyzes all legal,
ethical, and Biblical
issues from an
objective viewpoint,
using the facts and
rules of law to guide
analysis.
Analyzes most legal,
ethical, and Biblical
issues from an
objective viewpoint.
Uses some facts and/or
rules of law to guide
analysis.
Analyzes some
issues, mainly from
only one viewpoint.
Facts and/or rules of
law are not a driving
force of analysis.
The analysis does not
take competing
viewpoints into
account. Facts
and/or rules of law
are used sparingly or
not at all.
Dimension 4:
Articulation of
Conclusion
CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
1.4, 2.1, 2.1, 2.3, 3.2,
3.3
SLO – – 1.1, 1.2, 5.2,
5.3, 5.4
Directly articulates
conclusion in an
organized, logical
manner. Gives an
exemplary
demonstration of
how and why
analysis supports a
conclusion.
Directly articulates
conclusion. The
conclusion shows minor
errors in organization
and/or logic. Gives a
competent
demonstration of how
and why analysis
supports a conclusion.
The conclusion is
conveyed to the
reader but is not
directly
stated. Gives
competent but flaws
demonstration of
how and why
analysis supports a
conclusion.
The conclusion is not
directly stated, nor
presented in an
organized, logical
manner. Does not
demonstrate how
analysis supports a
conclusion.
Rubric Continued
Dimension
5: Writing/APA
Formatting
CLO – 1.1, 1.2,
1.3, 1.4
SLO – 1.1, 1.2,
1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6,
1.7, 1.8
Formal, mature,
polished, and
scholarly
academic voice is
present. Paper is
well organized,
error-free,
effective, and
professional in
strict APA format
Clear and
competent
academic
voice with
occasional
errors.
Competent,
developing
academic
voice and/or
multiple
errors.
Informal
voice with
consistent
errors.
Questions?
Please call, text or email 24/7:
afrisby@calbaptist.edu
949-500-4534
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
