Evidence Base Practice essay 2-3 references. table 7.3 is attached! Due on Wednesday morning… Although the official definition focuses on a desco STUDIES

Evidence Base Practice essay 2-3 references. table 7.3 is attached! Due on Wednesday morning… Although the official definition focuses
on a desco
STUDIES
agreement that research misconduct covers many
other issues including improprieties of authorship,
poor data management, conflicts of interest, inap-
propriate financial arrangements, failure to comply
with governmental regulations, and unauthorized
use of confidential information.
Research integrity is an important concern
in nursing. Jeffers and Whittemore (2005), for
example, engaged in work to identify and describe
were pocty voluntary
unobtrusively).
In thinking about
example, if a study
BOX 7.3. Guidelines for Critiquing the Ethical Aspects of a Study
CRITIQUING THE
three types of misconduct, there is widespread
ETHICS OF RESEARCH
be sufficine informatie
whether per bicipants were
Guidelines for critiquing ethical aspects of a steel
comfort.ports do not
are present BK 7.3. Members of an ethi
whether tormed conse
committer hand or provided with sufficient in
shouldert to situatic
formation to LRT all these questions. Researt
not have been gathered a
journal and decrever, do not always include
also consider who the
a
there should be more
procedures. You mis
1. Was the study approved and monitored by an Institutional Review Board, Research Ethics Board, or
psychological distress? Did the
3. Did the benefits to participants outweigh any potential risks or actual discomfort they experienced?
Did the benefits to society outweigh the costs to participants?
4. Was any type of coercion or undue influence used to recruit participants? Did they have se right to
refuse to participate or to withdraw without penalty?
5. Were participants deceived in any way? Were they fully aware of participating in a stucy and did
they understand the purpose and nature of the research?
6. Were appropriate informed consent procedures used? If not, were there valid and justifiable
reasons?
og
7. Were adequate steps taken to safeguard participants’ privacy? How was confidentiality maintained?
Were Privacy Rule procedures followed (if applicable)? Was a Certificate of Confidentiality
obtained? If not, should one have been obtained?
8. Were vulnerable groups involved in the research? If yes, were special precautions used because of
their vulnerable status?
for being “s
9. Were groups omitted from the inquiry without a justifiable rationale, such as women (or men), minori-
two viewpo
ask one per
ties, or older people?
given conf
the other.
other similar ethics review committee?
2. Were participants subjected to any physical harm, discomfort, or
researchers take appropriate steps to remove, prevent, or minimize harm?
the study participan
has been considera
of certain groups
research.
It is often dif
participants’ priv
researcher ment
anonymity. As
arises when dat
multaneously (
who are jointl
and Henderso
two people is
viewed about
interviewed

Purchase answer to see full
attachment