Grantham University Week 2 Developing a Statement of Work Research Paper Think of a service that is of interest to you and develop a statement of work whic

Grantham University Week 2 Developing a Statement of Work Research Paper Think of a service that is of interest to you and develop a statement of work which explains the requirements of these services.

The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:

Write between 800-900 words using Microsoft Word.
Use font size 12 and 1″ margins
Include cover page and reference page
At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing
No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references
Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.
Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style

References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.

Grading Criteria Assignments Maximum Points
Meets or exceeds established assignment criteria 40
Demonstrates an understanding of lesson concepts
Clearly presents well-reasoned ideas and concepts 30
Mechanics, punctuation, sentence structure, spelling that affects clarity, and citation of sources as needed 10
Total 100 Week 2 Lecture: “Statement of Work (SOW)”
During this lecture, we will discuss the Statement of Work (SOW).
The majority of government contracts include a statement of work (SOW) describing the
work to be performed and usually detailing a timeline and level of effort, so that an offeror
can respond to the solicitation with an appropriate proposal and cost estimate. The SOW
forms the basis for successful performance by the contractor, effective administration of
the contract by the government and serves as the standard for determining if the
contractor has met stated performance requirements. The SOW is binding and thoroughly
spells out the government’s requirements.
The SOW is utilized to determine the procedures and techniques the contractual worker is
to utilize when executing the arranged work. The SOW is intended to portray what could
possibly be done, well as how it is to be finished.
SOWs are point by point depictions, advising the contractor precisely what to do and how
to do it. By portraying the work in such detail, the administration basically gives the favored
methodology or answer for the issue, and secures in the methodology the contractor must
take. The peril of this technique, obviously, is that if the contractual worker takes after the
administration’s SOW and the outcome is unsuitable, it is the administration’s shortcoming.
While there is no particular layout for a SOW, most incorporate the following details:

Background – gives a general depiction of the prerequisite.
Objective – gives a concise explanation of the motivation behind the work or the
fancied deciding item. Scope – gives an expansive, nontechnical representation of
the way of the work required by the procurement.
Task Requirements – characterizes and clarifies in point of interest the work to be
performed, and demonstrates the strides the contractor will finish, commonly in
sequential request. Incorporates time of execution or conveyance date(s) for every
key result or undertaking; levels of exertion, if material; measure of travel expected;
and reporting prerequisites. Note that some SOWs separate out each of these
things in discrete areas.
Final Product(s) – indicates the product(s)/deliverable(s) that will be the deciding
result of every errand or stage.
This below specifications are extremely helpful in developing/reviewing a statement
of work (SOW) to ensure all required elements are addressed.
✓ Is the SOW Format complete? Does it contain: Title, Background/Purpose, Project
Philosophy, Scope, Applicable Documents, Tasks, Period of Performance and Place of
✓ Are all acronyms and abbreviations clearly defined and identified?
✓ Are reference documents properly described and cited?
✓ Are the government’s general constraints for the contracted work outlined? Examples
follow below. (More critical and detailed constraints should be called out separately.)
1. Has the Government enumerated the quantity of products sought?
2. Have all the deliverables been identified, to include plans, documents, schedules,
3. Has the government stipulated the place of delivery for the products or services
4. Has the government stipulated the period of performance to deliver the products or
services sought? Are option years included (if applicable)?
5. Has the government stipulated how all contractor products or services delivered will
be tested and evaluated for acceptance into the government inventory (e.g.
developmental testing & evaluation, operational testing & evaluation, etc.)?
6. Has the government stipulated how all contractor products or services delivered will
be incorporated into the receiving agency’s maintenance and supply system (e.g.
how products will be stored, maintained, transported, packaged & handled, etc.)?
7. Has the government stipulated all contractor products or services to be delivered
(quantity, location, condition, acceptance procedures, quality, etc.)?
8. Has the government stipulated how all documentation and records describing
contractor products or services will be delivered?
✓ Are the government’s requirements specifically defined? Does the SOW fully describe
what work and how the work is to be performed, and the processes the contractor is to use
and tasks to be performed?
Is the language in the SOW clear and concise? Has all vague or ambiguous language
been removed?
Consistency – Is the SOW consistent from section to section? Are the same words,
acronyms, and descriptions used as appropriate throughout the document?
✓ Are there any other government contractors this contractor needs to work with? Is an
Associate Contractor Agreement required/stipulated?
Engelbeck, R. M. (2001) Acquisition Management. Vienna, VA: Management Concepts,
Inc. ISBN: 978-1567261288
Far website:

Purchase answer to see full

"Order a similar paper and get 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!"

Order Now