JUS 331 SNHU Criminal Justice case While Milestone Two allowed you to consider Jack’s case, Milestone Three revolves around Diane’s case in your case study

JUS 331 SNHU Criminal Justice case While Milestone Two allowed you to consider Jack’s case, Milestone Three revolves around Diane’s case in your case study analysis. A case study allows you to evaluate the situation with your course knowledge, regardless of your position within the juvenile justice system, and provides a hands-on approach with juvenile justice. In Milestone Three, you will assume various legal roles to evaluating the juvenile offender Diane’s rights during arrest, the hearing process, and the appropriate options available to enforce upon the juvenile offender.Submit a draft of the Diane’s Case section of the Final Project.To complete this assignment, review the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric document. JUS 331 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
While Milestone Two allowed you to consider Jack’s case, Milestone Three revolves around Diane’s case. In Milestone Three, you will assume various legal roles
and evaluate the juvenile offender’s rights during arrest, the hearing process, and the appropriate options available to enforce upon the juvenile offender.
For Milestone Three, you will submit a draft of Section III of the final project: Diane’s Case.
Jack and Diane are each 13 years old and are best friends. On September 12, 2012, Jack asked Diane to meet him at Moe’s Convenience Store. While in the store,
Jack steals three packs of gum and a candy bar. Jack hands Diane two boxes of candy to place in her purse. Diane places the candy in her purse. The store owner,
Moe, notices Diane place items in her purse. As Jack and Diane exit the store, Moe calls their names and runs after them. Jack pushes Moe to the ground and
exits with Diane.
Moe calls the police and reports the theft. The police apprehend Jack and Diane a few blocks away from the store. The police only retrieve the boxes of candy
from Diane but not the packs of gum or the candy bar taken by Jack. The police escort Jack and Diane to the police station where they question them for two
hours regarding the theft. Diane confesses her and Jack’s role in the theft. Jack denies any wrongdoing. The police charge Jack and Diane with theft and also
charge Jack with simple assault. Their hearings are within the state‐mandated time after they are petitioned to appear in the local juvenile court.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
III.
Diane’s Case
a) Were Diane’s due process and constitutional rights violated during the investigation process? Explain your arguments.
b) Were Diane’s due process and constitutional rights violated during the hearing process? Explain your arguments.
c) If you were the defense attorney, what arguments would you make in defense of Diane? Defend your response.
d) If you were the prosecutor, what arguments would you make in prosecution of Diane? Defend your response.
e) Would Diane’s case have been handled differently in the federal system? How would the process be different?
f) What would be an appropriate court‐ordered option available based on the fact pattern from the defense attorney and prosecutorial
perspectives?
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a one‐ to two‐page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12‐point Times New Roman
font, one‐inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements
Diane’s Case: The
Investigation
Diane’s Case: Hearing
Process
Diane’s Case: Defense
Diane’s Case: Prosecution
Diane’s Case: Federal
System
Diane’s Case: Court‐Ordered
Option
Articulation of Response
Proficient (100%)
Explains if Diane’s due process and
constitutional rights were violated during
the investigation process and explains
arguments
Explains if Diane’s due process and
constitutional rights were violated during
the hearing process and explains
arguments
Establishes arguments that could be used
in defense of Diane and defends response
Establishes arguments that could be used
in prosecuting Diane, and defends
response
Describes how Diane’s case would have
been handled differently in the federal
system, including how the process would
be different
Determines what would be an
appropriate court‐ordered option based
on the fact pattern from the defense
attorney and prosecutorial perspectives
Submission has no major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization
Needs Improvement (75%)
Explains if Diane’s due process and
constitutional rights were violated during
the investigation process, but does not
explain arguments
Explains if Diane’s due process and
constitutional rights were violated during
the hearing process, but does not explain
arguments
Establishes arguments that could be used
in defense of Diane, but does not defend
response
Establishes arguments that could be used
in prosecuting Diane, but does not
defend response
Describes how Diane’s case would have
been handled differently in the federal
system, but does not describe how the
process would be different
Determines what would be an
appropriate court‐ordered option based
on the fact pattern from the defense
attorney or prosecutorial perspectives,
but not both
Submission has major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that negatively impact
readability and articulation of main ideas
Not Evident (0%)
Does not explain if Diane’s due process
and constitutional rights were violated
during the investigation process
Value
15
Does not explain if Diane’s due process
and constitutional rights were violated
during the hearing process
15
Does not establish defense arguments for
Diane
15
Does not establish prosecuting
arguments for Diane
15
Does not describe how Diane’s case
would have been handled differently in
the federal system
15
Does not determine an appropriate
court‐ordered option
15
Submission has critical errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that prevent understanding
of ideas
Earned Total
10
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment