JUS375 Journal 2 SNHU DNA Analysis Read Report to the Attorney General on Delays in Forensic DNA Analysis. Then write a journal assignment in which you ans
JUS375 Journal 2 SNHU DNA Analysis Read Report to the Attorney General on Delays in Forensic DNA Analysis. Then write a journal assignment in which you answer the following questions:Should DNA testing be mandatory in all cases where DNA is collected? Why or why not? Do you agree with the report’s findings?From the report, which recommendation would you prioritize if you were given the opportunity to implement it within your state or department? Why? JUS 375 Journal Two Rubric
Overview: Journals in this course are private between the student and the instructor. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply
what you learn each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on
your educational and professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills. Journal activities offer you
the opportunity to further develop these skills.
Prompt: Read Report to the Attorney General on Delays in Forensic DNA Analysis. Then write a journal assignment in which you answer the following questions:
Should DNA testing be mandatory in all cases where DNA is collected? Why or why not? Do you agree with the report’s findings?
From the report, which recommendation would you prioritize, if you were given the opportunity to implement it within your state or department? Why?
Refer to your textbook and relevant scholarly sources to support the points and observations made in your journal assignment.
Guidelines for Submission: Your journal assignment must be 300–400 words (excluding the references). Citations should be formatted according to APA style.
Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.
Critical Elements
Exemplary (100%)
Proficient (85%)
Reflections on Mandatory Meets “Proficient” criteria,
Evaluates the extent to which
DNA Testing
and the evaluation provides
DNA testing should be
clear and persuasive reasoning mandatory in cases where
DNA is collected, exploring the
pros and cons and affirming
stance
Recommendation
Meets “Proficient” criteria,
Identifies priorities in
Priorities
and stance is further
implementing
supported with local
recommendations and logical
justifications or anecdotes
supporting explanation
Needs Improvement (55%)
Affirms stance on mandatory
DNA testing but lacks logical
explanation of both pros and
cons
Not Evident (0%)
Does not affirm stance or
address mandatory DNA
testings
Identifies priorities in
implementing
recommendations but lacks
supporting explanation
Does not identify priorities in
implementing
recommendations
Value
30
30
Incorporation of Evidence Meets “Proficient” criteria,
and Scholarly Resources and the synthesis of sources is
especially well supported,
cogent, and insightful
Analysis of evidence from text
and scholarly sources is
logical, well supported, and of
appropriate depth and
complexity
Articulation of Response Meets “Proficient” criteria and Submission has no major
has excellent syntax and
errors related to citations,
sentence construction
grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization
Analysis of evidence from text
and scholarly sources is
illogical and/or not well
supported or lacks
appropriate depth and
complexity
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that negatively
impact readability and
articulation of main ideas
Does not include any evidence
from text and scholarly
sources to support the points
and observations
30
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that prevent
understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total
100%
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
