LDR 600 Theoretical Framework for Leadership Select a book about leadership by a successful leader whom you believe has adopted leadership as a vocation. I

LDR 600 Theoretical Framework for Leadership Select a book about leadership by a successful leader whom you believe has adopted leadership as a vocation. It can be a book by a well-known individual in the discipline of leadership or a leader in your own field, religion, sport, or another area of personal interest. Students are encouraged to select their book early in the course (at least before the end of Topic 2) to allow time for thoughtful reading and planning for this assignment.

In an analysis of 750-900 words, examine the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits presented in the selected book. Discuss how this particular individual has adopted leadership as a vocation. As a leader, which qualities of this person would you seek to emulate in order to inspire followership? Which shortcomings of this leadership approach would you attempt to overcome? Be sure to cite examples from the book and integrate a minimum of four secondary sources on leadership theory to support your analysis.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

MUST FOLLOW RUBRIC (ATTACHED) ,4 REFERENCE REQUIRED WITH IN TEXT CITATIONS.

THE BOOK WE CHOSE IS AS FOLLWS

book: Leadership is an Art.

Author: Max De Pree
Date: 2004

Summary: Referred to as the “bible for the business world,” the book, written by the successful former CEO of Herman Miller

Reference:

Pree, M. D. (2004). Leadership is an art. New York: Currency. Course Code
LDR-600
Class Code
LDR-600-O101
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Selection of Book About a Leader Who Chose
Leadership as a Vocation
20.0%
Theoretical Framework, Style, and Leadership
Traits present in the Work 2.1: Analyze theories
of leadership and motivation in order to inspire
followership.
25.0%
Qualities and Shortcomings of the Selected
Leader
25.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Benchmark – Analysis of a Theoretical Framework for Leadership
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Does not select a book about a leader or provide an
explanation as to why that person chose leadership as a
vocation.
Does not examine the theoretical framework, style, and
leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as
how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation.
Does not explain the qualities of the selected leader to
emulate or the shortcomings of the leadership approach to
overcome.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly
Sources are not documented.
200.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of
why that person chose leadership as a vocation is incomplete
or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or
irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Examination of the theoretical framework, style, and
leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as
how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation is
incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is
vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or
inconsistent.
Explanation of the qualities of the selected leader to emulate
and the shortcomings of the leadership approach to
overcome is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify
conclusions is vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is
unclear and/or inconsistent.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or
word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but
not varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Presents an elemental selection of a book about a leader as
well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a
vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents an elemental examination of the theoretical
framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the
selected work as well as how the individual has adopted
leadership as their vocation. Some subject knowledge is
evident.
Presents an elemental explanation of the qualities of the
selected leader to emulate and the shortcomings of the
leadership approach to overcome. Some subject knowledge is
evident.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Presents a selection of a book about a leader as well as
explanation of why that person chose leadership as a
vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included.
Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents an examination of the theoretical framework, style,
and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well
as how the individual has adopted leadership as their
vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included.
Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents an explanation of the qualities of the selected leader
to emulate and the shortcomings of the leadership approach
to overcome. Detailed examples and evidence are included.
Subject knowledge is competent.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
Presents a thorough and fully-developed selection of a book
about a leader as well as explanation of why that person
chose leadership as a vocation. Offers detailed evidence that
justifies conclusions about the selection and explanation.
Includes relevant examples and applicable insight.
Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and
Presents a thorough and fully-developed examination of the
theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that
present in the selected work as well as how the individual has
adopted leadership as their vocation. Offers detailed
evidence that justifies conclusions about the examination.
Includes relevant examples and applicable insight.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed explanation of the
qualities of the selected leader to emulate and the
shortcomings of the leadership approach to overcome. Offers
detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the
explanation. Includes relevant examples and applicable
insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of
the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment