Liberal Arts and Stem Majors Proof Reading Essay Hello, I just need to have someone proof read my essay.In the first paragraph I am trying to summarize the

Liberal Arts and Stem Majors Proof Reading Essay Hello, I just need to have someone proof read my essay.In the first paragraph I am trying to summarize the two articles I am using. In the second paragraph I tried to challenge one article with other. in the third paragraph I tried to prove that both article are right and they are put together it would be a stronger argument.Please feel free to add anything you want. all the arguments should be based from the articles. I need to make sure that the grammar , ponctuation and spelling is correct. Assignment F+
Liberal Arts and STEM majors are controversial topics that until now educators, students
and writers are still debating about. On one hand, I support Jones Nicholaos in the way he claims
in his article “Liberal Arts, and the advantages of being useless”, that liberal arts majors make us
question ourselves, shape our personalities and is more important than other majors in the way it
prepares a generation of responsible citizens. Yet, I do not completely agree with his critiques to
STEM majors because they are as important as liberal arts majors and are even more important
for the society to grow economically as Conard Edward confirms in his article “we don’t need
more humanities majors”. In this essay, I will prove that STEM and humanities majors are
equally important and having them simultaneously will help in the economic, social and political
growth of a nation.
Nowadays, education is not only a preparation for work. Education became an essential
step in one’s life to gain skills, discover themselves and develop their personality. Humanities
majors focus the most on this aspect by providing content dedicated to build a responsible
generation, flourish students’ critical thinking skills and enhance their creativity. I agree with
Jones when he says: “the goals one aims to achieve in pursuing liberal arts degree transcend the
particular content of those degrees; they are goals which ought to be achieved by any active and
responsible citizen”(26). In fact, the way the content of these majors is designed make them
unique in shaping personalities and developing the citizenship of individuals by working on
more soft and interpersonal skills and deepening their understanding of what surrounds them. In
this context, Jones states that “ Liberal Arts disciplines are designed to give the tools for being an
active and responsible citizens, rather than tools for performing a specialized task for someone
else” (Missing). On the other hand, Conard, in his article, sheds light on why we need to focus
more on STEM majors he states: “Contrary to popular belief, U.S. employment growth isn’t
outpacing other high-wages economies because of growing employment in small businesses.[…].
U.S. growth is predominantly driven by successful high-tech startups, such as Google, Microsoft,
and Apple, which have spawned large industries around them”(41). In addition to that, Conard
argues that some people with liberal arts degree will eventually go back to school because they
realize that their degree is not as useful as a STEM major degree. He states: “It’s true some
advanced degree holder may have earned undergraduate degree in humanities, but they quickly
learned humanities degree alone offered inadequate training, and they returned to school for
more technical degrees” (42). With that being said, I believe that both Jones and Conard are both
right to some degree and these two articles could be used together to prove that we need both
STEM and Liberal Arts majors to have a healthy and stable economy.
In the article “Liberal arts, and the advantages of being useless”, I do not agree with jones
when he tries to diminish the importance of STEM majors by saying “Technical and vocational
disciplines – Engineering, Nursing, Business – make people useful to others for specialized
purposes; but they do not make people better citizens”(27). On the other hand, I agree with
Conard that we need to focus more on STEM, business, law and health care majors as there is a
need in the 21st century job market while humanities can be learnt during extra-trainings.
Besides this growing need, Conards points out that business and technology have positively
impacted America’s economic growth by providing jobs to skilled workers as well as unskilled
ones (42). Conard concludes: “Fully harnessing America’s talent and putting it to work
addressing the needs of mankind directly would have a greater impact on raising standards of
living in both the US and the rest of the world than other alternatives available today.” Moreover,
Jones makes a counterargument to his own argument by saying: “Liberal Arts disciplines, in
contrast, make people better citizens; but they do not make people useful to others for any
particular purpose”(27). I personally believe that to be a good citizens we have to work in order
to achieve certain goals and serve to improve the society. In this sense, Conard states: “Critical
thinking is valuable in all forms, but it is more valuable when applied directly to the most
pressing demands of society”(42). Nevertheless, I agree with Conard that having more STEM
majors would definitely improve the economy of the united states because “STEM-related
degree declining sharply over the last two decades, the industry has turned to foreign-born
workers and increasingly offshore to fill its talent needs”(Conard, 42). With that being said, by
having more STEM majors in the U.S. there would be no need to use foreighn resources.
Although Conard explains the value of STEM, he seems to have his own bias against Liberal
Arts. I personally believe that having a background of liberal arts would allow people to have
“Wisdom and compassion for fairly weighing and critically evaluation competing
priorities”(Jones 24). Moreover, True STEM majors are very important to the growth of our
society, however, I do not agree with Conard cretiques to Liberal Arts majors when he says
““[…]It is hard to believe that humanities degree programs are the best way to train America’s
most talented students” (41). Because Liberal Art major students are able to think, solve, and
analyze different issues in different fields which makes them in some way talented. In this
context Jones states: “People with a Liberal Arts degree have extensive and focused training for
reading with comprehension, reasoning properly, communicating creatively and effectively[…]
and sustaining intellectual curiosity”(28). For these reasons I believe that having both Liberal
Arts majors and STEM majors in a country would help improve not only the economy but would
also make a healthier society.
Overall, both Conard and Jones fail to recognize that STEM and Liberal Arts majors are
complementary to each other. That is why both articles could be put together to prove that all
majors are important for different reasons. I believe that having a variety of majors would help
individuals in particular and society in general, but what is more important is to build an
education system that teaches young adults the importance of different majors.
—

Purchase answer to see full
attachment