NRS490 Grand Canyon Control in Outpatient Diabetic Adults Literature Evaluation tool Paper In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of

NRS490 Grand Canyon Control in Outpatient Diabetic Adults Literature Evaluation tool Paper In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being able to articulate the information and successfully summarize relevant peer-reviewed articles in a scholarly fashion helps to support the student’s ability and confidence to further develop and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments that constitute the components of the course change proposal capstone project.

For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eight peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation table that determines the level and strength of evidence for each of the eight articles. The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” resource to complete this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

NRS-490-RS-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx

I will upload the rubric to follow and copy of the table to write in please follow the rubric, APA this is a nursing capstone class, my topic is having better A1C control in outpatient diabetic adults through intensive nursing visits about diet, medications and lifestyle changes Rubric
Literature Evaluation Table
2
1
3
Less Than
Unsatisfactory 0Satisfactory 76Satisfactory 7271%
79%
75%
0.00%
79.00%
75.00%
100.0 %Article
Selection
5.0 %Author, Journal
(Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working
Link to Access Article
Author, journal
(peer-reviewed),
and permalink or
working link to
access article
section is not
included.
Author, journal
(peer-reviewed),
and permalink or
working link to
access article
section is
present, but it
lacks detail or is
incomplete.
Author, journal
(peer-reviewed),
and permalink or
working link to
access article
section is
present.
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
Author, journal
(peer-reviewed),
and permalink or
working link to
access article
section is clearly
provided and
well developed.
5
Excellent 90100%
100.00%
Author, journal
(peer-reviewed),
and permalink or
working link to
access article
section is
comprehensive
and thoroughly
developed with
supporting
details.
5.0 %Article Title and Article title and Article title and Article title and Article title and Article title and
Year Published
year published
year published
year published
year published
year published
section is not
section is
section is
section is clearly section is
included.
present, but it
present.
provided and
comprehensive
lacks detail or is
well developed. and thoroughly
incomplete.
developed with
supporting
details.
10.0 %Research
Research
Research
Research
Research
Research
Questions (Qualitative) questions
questions
questions
questions
questions
or Hypothesis
(qualitative) or (qualitative) or (qualitative) or (qualitative) or (qualitative) or
(Quantitative), and
hypothesis
hypothesis
hypothesis
hypothesis
hypothesis
Purposes or Aim of
(quantitative), (quantitative), (quantitative), (quantitative), (quantitative),
Study
and purposes or and purposes or and purposes or and purposes or and purposes or
aim of study
aim of study
aim of study
aim of study
aim of study
section is not
section is
section is
section is clearly section is
included.
present, but it
present.
provided and
comprehensive
lacks detail or is
well developed. and thoroughly
incomplete.
developed with
supporting
details.
5.0 %Design (Type of
Design (type of Design (type of Design (type of Design (type of Design (type of
Quantitative, or Type of quantitative, or quantitative, or quantitative, or quantitative, or quantitative, or
Qualitative)
type of
type of
type of
type of
type of
qualitative)
qualitative)
qualitative)
qualitative)
qualitative)
section is not
section is
section is
section is clearly section is
included.
present, but it
present.
provided and
comprehensive
lacks detail or is
well developed. and thoroughly
incomplete.
developed with
supporting
details.
5.0 %Setting or Sample Setting or sample Setting or sample Setting or sample Setting or sample Setting or sample
section is not
section is
section is
section is clearly section is
included.
present, but it
present.
provided and
comprehensive
lacks detail or is
well developed. and thoroughly
incomplete.
developed with
supporting
details.
5.0 %Methods:
Intervention or
Instruments
Methods:
Intervention or
instruments
section is not
included.
Methods:
Intervention or
instruments
section is
present, but it
lacks detail or is
incomplete.
Methods:
Intervention or
instruments
section is
present.
Methods:
Intervention or
instruments
section is clearly
provided and
well developed.
10.0 %Analysis
Analysis section
is not included.
Analysis section Analysis section
is present, but it is present.
lacks detail or is
incomplete.
Analysis section
is clearly
provided and
well developed.
10.0 %Key Findings
Key findings
section is not
included.
Key findings
Key findings
section is
section is
present, but it
present.
lacks detail or is
incomplete.
Key findings
section is clearly
provided and
well developed.
10.0 %Recommendation Recommendation Recommendation Recommendation
s
s section is not s section is
s section is
included.
present, but it
present.
lacks detail or is
incomplete.
Recommendation
s section is
clearly provided
and well
developed.
10.0 %Explanation of
How the Article
Supports EBP or
Capstone
Explanation of
how the article
supports EBP or
capstone section
is not included.
Explanation of
how the article
supports EBP or
capstone section
is present, but it
lacks detail or is
incomplete.
Explanation of
how the article
supports EBP or
capstone section
is clearly
provided and
well developed.
10.0 %Presentation
The piece is not
neat or
organized, and it
does not include
all required
elements.
The work is not The overall
neat and includes appearance is
minor flaws or
general, and
omissions of
major elements
required
are missing.
elements.
10.0 %Mechanics of
Writing (includes
spelling, punctuation,
grammar, and language
use)
Surface errors
are pervasive
enough that they
impede
communication
of meaning.
Inappropriate
word choice or
sentence
construction is
employed.
Frequent and
Some mechanical Prose is largely
repetitive
errors or typos
free of
mechanical
are present, but mechanical
errors distract
they are not
errors, although
the reader.
overly distracting a few may be
Inconsistencies in to the reader.
present. The
language choice Correct and
writer uses a
(register) or word varied sentence variety of
choice are
structure and
effective
present.
audiencesentence
Sentence
appropriate
structures and
structure is
language are
figures of
correct but not employed.
speech.
varied.
Explanation of
how the article
supports EBP or
capstone section
is present.
The overall
appearance is
generally neat,
with a few minor
flaws or missing
elements.
Methods:
Intervention or
instruments
section is
comprehensive
and thoroughly
developed with
supporting
details.
Analysis section
is comprehensive
and thoroughly
developed with
supporting
details.
Key findings
section is
comprehensive
and thoroughly
developed with
supporting
details.
Recommendation
s section is
comprehensive
and thoroughly
developed with
supporting
details.
Explanation of
how the article
supports EBP or
capstone section
is comprehensive
and thoroughly
developed with
supporting
details.
The work is well
presented and
includes all
required
elements. The
overall
appearance is
neat and
professional.
The writer is
clearly in
command of
standard,
written,
academic
English.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources are not
Sources (citations,
documented.
footnotes, references,
bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to
assignment and style)
100 %Total Weightage
Documentation
of sources is
inconsistent or
incorrect, as
appropriate to
assignment and
style, with
numerous
formatting
errors.
Sources are
documented, as
appropriate to
assignment and
style, although
some formatting
errors may be
present.
Sources are
Sources are
documented, as completely and
appropriate to
correctly
assignment and documented, as
style, and format appropriate to
is mostly correct. assignment and
style, and format
is free of error.
Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name: Gregory Catania RN
Change Topic (2-3 sentences):
Criteria
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and
Permalink or Working
Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year
Published
Research Questions
(Qualitative)/Hypothesis
(Quantitative), and
Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of
Quantitative, or Type of
Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods:
Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the
Article Supports
EBP/Capstone Project
© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Article 4
Criteria
Article 5
Article 6
Article 7
Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and
Permalink or Working
Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year
Published
Research Questions
(Qualitative)/Hypothesis
(Quantitative), and
Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of
Quantitative, or Type of
Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods:
Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the
Article Supports
EBP/Capstone
© 2017. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Article 8
Running Head: PICOT
1
PICOT Statement on Diabetes
Gregory Catania RN
Grand Canyon University
NRS 490
11/25/18
2
PICOT
PICOT Statement on Diabetes
Over the past few decades, diabetes has become a predominant health concern in the world.
The prevalence of prolonged, non-communicable illnesses is increasing at a rapid rate. It is
estimated that about 19 million individuals die annually due to cardiovascular illness, for which
diabetes is the major underlying cause (Vakili et al., 2015). At the moment, over 1.7 billion adults
worldwide are overweight and 315 million of them being obese. The number of adults with type 2
diabetes is approximated to be 250 million and it is projected to increase to 400 million by 2025
(Marseglia et al., 2016). With these statistics, it implies that a diabetes epidemic is underway.
Diabetes occurs due to the impaired glucose sensitivity, whereby the blood glucose is too high.
The key risk factors for diabetes include obesity and physical inactivity. Research has proved that
the risk of developing diabetes can be significantly reduced by lifestyle changes (RuszkowskaGiastek et al., 2015). That said, this paper illustrates a PICOT statement on diabetes, especially on
adults, and how it can be controlled.
PICOT Question:
An increased glucose level is independently related to an increased A1C level. Does reducing the
A1C levels with specialized teaching from the nurse, practitioners, and dieticians help to control
diabetes on adult patients?
Population:
The population for the study are American adult patients diagnosed for type 2 diabetes, aging 40
to 60 years old. This population is heterogeneous with respect to comorbidities and general health
status, which is important to establishing the appropriate intervention.
3
PICOT
Intervention:
The intervention is quite essential as it explains on the way the researchers addressed the problem
and helped the population specified for the study. Implementation of dietary and lifestyle changes
would help control type 2 diabetes.
Comparison:
In order to determine whether the intervention is successful, A1C levels would be measured before
and after the changes in lifestyle and diet.
Outcome:
At the end of the study, it is expected that the A1C levels of adult diabetic patients would reduce.
Timeframe:
The research would be conducted over a period of 12 weeks.
PICOT Statement
Control of type 2 diabetes for American newly diagnosed adult patients has been problematic (P)
due to the poor lifestyle and diet, which leads to an increased glucose level. Specialized teaching
from the nurse, practitioners, and dieticians is an effective strategy to make the patients live
appropriately by eating the right food and doing exercises (I), which can enable them to control
their A1C levels (C) and live the normal life (O) within 12 weeks (T).
Education as regards to lifestyle modifications has been proved to be an effective
intervention for controlling type 2 diabetes. Kuo et al. (2015) indicate that lifestyle interventions
such as regular exercises and diet changes reduce the incidence of diabetes by 53 percent compared
4
PICOT
to the control group. People assigned to these interventions reported reduced A1C levels than the
control group. In a similar study by Islam, et al. (2014), changing the lifestyle plays a key role in
reducing in the glucose levels, which further minimizes the cases of diabetes by 27 percent.
Hence, there is an important relationship between increased glucose level and increased
A1C level as well as the lifestyle change and reduced A1C levels, which leads to effective control
of diabetes. Among patients with pre-diabetes, it is worth to control their diet and do regular
exercises to help in a decrease of diabetes occurrence. Failure to prevent diabetes means increased
mortality. It is, therefore, the responsibility of each person to ensure they are living a healthy life
to lower the risk of diabetes.
5
PICOT
References
Islam, S.M.S., Alam, D.S., & Wahiduzzaman, M., Nielsen, L.W, Fresch, G., Ferrari, U, Seisoler,
J, Rouf, H, M.A & Lechner, A. (2014). Clinical Characteristics and Complications of
Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Attending an Urban Hospital in Bangladesh. Diabetes and
Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research Reviews, 1-7
Kuo, Y., Goodwin, J.S. & Chen, N. Lwin, K.K., Baillargeon, J., & Raji, M.A. (2015). Diabetes
Mellitus Care Providers by Nurse Practitioners versus Primary Care Physicians, Journal
of American Geriatric Society. 63 (10), 1980-1988
Marseglia, A., Fratigioni, L., Laukka, E.J., Santoni, G., Pedersen, J., Backman, L. & Xu, W.
(2016). Early Cognitive Deficits in Type 2 Diabetes A Population Based Study. Journal
of Alzheimer Disease. 53, 1069-1078
Ruszkowska-Giastek, B., Sollup, A., Wernik, T., Rupiecht, Z., Golalczkyk, K., Gadomska, G. &
Rosc, D. (2015). Effect of Uncontrolled Hyperglycemia on levels of Adhesion Molecules
in Patient with Diabetic Mellitus Type 2. Zhejiang University- Science (Biomedical and
Biotechnology) 16 (5), 355-361
Vakili, S.T.T., Nezami, B.G., Shetty, A., Chetty, V.K. & Srinivasan, S. (2015). Association of
High Dietary Saturated Fat Intake and Uncontrolled Diabetes with Constipation:
Evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Neurogastoral
Motil, 27 (10), 1389-1397

Purchase answer to see full
attachment