NUR699 Methods To Implement The Proposed Solution Section F: Implementation Plan In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page), provi

NUR699 Methods To Implement The Proposed Solution Section F: Implementation Plan

In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page), provide a description of the methods to be used to implement the proposed solution. Include the following:

Describe the setting and access to potential subjects. If there is a need for a consent or approval form, then one must be created. Although you will not be submitting the consent or approval form(s) in Topic 5 with the narrative, the consent or approval form(s) should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Describe the amount of time needed to complete this project. Create a timeline. Make sure the timeline is general enough that it can be implemented at any date. Although you will not be submitting the timeline in Topic 5 with the narrative, the timeline should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Describe the resources (human, fiscal, and other) or changes needed in the implementation of the solution. Consider the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Provide a resource list. Although you will not be submitting the resource list in Topic 5 with the narrative, the resource list should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Describe the methods and instruments, such as a questionnaire, scale, or test to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Develop the instruments. Although you will not be submitting the individual instruments in Topic 5 with the narrative, the instruments should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Explain the process for delivering the (intervention) solution and indicate if any training will be needed.
Provide an outline of the data collection plan. Describe how data management will be maintained and by whom. Furthermore, provide an explanation of how the data analysis and interpretation process will be conducted. Develop the data collection tools that will be needed. Although you will not be submitting the data collection tools in Topic 5 with the narrative, the data collection tools should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Describe the strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges.
Establish the feasibility of the implementation plan. Address the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, presentation development). Make sure to provide a brief rationale for each. Develop a budget plan. Although you will not be submitting the budget plan in Topic 5 with the narrative, the budget plan should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section F: Implementation Plan” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section. Course Code
NUR-699
Class Code
NUR-699-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Setting and Subjects
5.0%
Timeline
5.0%
Solution Process and Resources
15.0%
Solution methods and instruments
10.0%
Data Collection and Management
20.0%
Budget
10.0%
Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise,
and discontinue a proposed solution after
implementation
5.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Research Citations (In-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference
page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section F: Implementation Plan
No Submissions (71.00%)
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
60.0
Unsatisfactory
(75.00%)
Does not fully describe the organizational setting and/or
access to potential subjects. Information is ambiguous and
leaves the audience questioning.
Presents inadequate organization and/or development of the
amount of time needed to complete the project.
Gives vague and/or incomplete description of the human,
fiscal, and other resources and process for delivering the
(intervention) solution. More than one major component of
the criteria is missing.
Gives vague and/or incomplete the methods and instruments
to be used for monitoring the implementation of the
proposed solution.
Presents inadequate data collection and management
system. The major points of the data analysis and
interpretation process are ambiguous or missing. No
strategies to deal with the management of any barriers,
facilitators, and challenges have been presented.
Significant information is missing from the budget or the
budget is not provided. Does not clearly specify in the budget
how funds will be used.
Projected costs in the budget
are unrelated to the implementation of the project.
Description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and
discontinue a proposed solution after implementation lacks
critical data.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Less Than Satisfactory
(80.00%)
Presents some characteristics of the organizational setting
but leaves essential data out. Outlines the access to potential
subjects but the information is not developed or
comprehensive

A basic timeline is present without detail. Insufficient details
are provided.
One of the following may be missing or inadequate:
Lists
the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the
implementation of the solution.
Identifies with minimal
detail the clinical tools or process changes that would need to
take place.
Outlines the process for delivering the
(intervention) solution.
Lists the methods and instruments to be used for monitoring
the implementation of the proposed solution.
Comprehensive alignment and details are missing. Minimal
details are present.
A limited data collection and management system is
described. One of the following is inadequate or missing:
Basic outline of the major points of the data analysis and
interpretation process is present.
Lists strategies to deal
with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and
challenges.
Some examples and details are used.
Presents a broad general explanation of the budget.
Projected costs in the budget do not reflect realistic amounts
for implementing the project. At least half of the criteria
below is present:
Addresses the costs for personnel,
consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the
institute), computer related costs (librarian consultation,
Description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and
discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is
minimal. Details are lacking.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, and/or word choice are present.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Satisfactory
(88.00%)
Lists the characteristics of the organizational setting and
outlines the access to potential subjects. Minimal use of
examples and details is present.
An outline of the amount of time needed to complete the
project is present but may be inconsistent. Some facts are
detailed while a few are missing.
Lists the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the
implementation of the solution. Identifies with minimal detail
the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take
place.
Outlines the process for delivering the
(intervention) solution. Provides some detail although
limited.
Presents a general description of
the methods and
instruments to be used for monitoring the implementation of
the proposed solution. Minimal details are present.
A limited data collection and management system is
described. Basic outline of the major points of the data
analysis and interpretation process is present. Lists strategies
to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and
challenges. Some examples and details are used.
Addresses most areas of the budget, but lacks some details.
Gives a general explanation in the budget narrative of how
the funds will be used. Projected costs in the budget do not
reflect realistic amounts for implementing the project. The
majority of the criteria below is present:
Addresses the
costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not
Surface level description of plans to maintain, extend, revise,
and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is
offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure
and audience-appropriate language are used.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
Good
(92.00%)
Presents a detailed outline of the organizational setting and
access to potential subjects. Examples are provided.
An outline of the amount of time needed to complete the
project is present. Important components are give adequate
attention and detail.
Presents a detailed outline of the human, fiscal, and other
resources needed for the implementation of the solution.
Supplies the rationale for any clinical tools or process changes
that would need to take place.
Explains the process for
delivering the (intervention) solution.
Information is
accurate, appropriate, and
integrated effectively.
Provides a clear, specific outline of
how/why/which
methods and instruments are
to be used for monitoring
the implementation of the proposed solution. Provides
additional information on
instrument strengths and
weaknesses.
An adequate data collection and management system is
outlined with some detail. Presents detailed description of
the major points of the data analysis and interpretation
process. Outlines appropriate strategies to deal with the
management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges.
Examples and details are used throughout.
Contains a comprehensive outline of the budget information
for the entire project. Explains how the funds will be used.
Projected costs in the budget are reasonable. Addresses the
costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not
provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian
consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel,
Presents direct, competent, and appropriate analysis of plans
to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed
solution after implementation. Outlines in detail if goals were
met,
effectiveness and quality of the solution, and
further recommendations. Provides examples and details.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth
progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct.
Excellent
(100.00%)
Presents a full description of the organizational setting and
access to potential subjects. Examples and details are indepth and expanded upon.
Effective organization contributes to the full development
and presentation of the amount of time needed to complete
the project. Essential components within the project are
specified.
Presents a full detailed in-depth description of the human,
fiscal, and other resources needed for the implementation of
the solution. Presents specific detail and rationale for any
clinical tools or process changes that would need to take
place.
Explains the process for delivering the
(intervention) solution, outlining each step. Demonstrates an
Provides a clear, specific description of
how/why/which
methods and instruments are
to be used for monitoring
the implementation of the proposed solution. Provides
additional information on
possible alternative methods
as well as instrument strengths and weaknesses.
Presents a comprehensive detailed outline of the data
collection plan. Describes in-depth how the data
management will be maintained Thoroughly describes the
major points of the data analysis and interpretation process.
Formulates appropriate strategies to deal with the
management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges.
Contains complete budget information for the entire project.
Explains in detail how the funds will be used. Projected costs
in the budget are reasonable Provides detailed and
convincing budget narrative justifying costs. Addresses the
costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not
provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian
Comments
Thoughtfully analyzes, evaluates, and describes plans to
maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution
after implementation. Supports rationale. Describes in detail
if goals were met,
effectiveness and quality of the
solution, and further recommendations. Provides examples
and details throughout.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of
the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment