CRJ305 CSU Classical and neoclassical schools of criminology Type of Crime In an essay, identify and explain two ways in which a particular type of crime

CRJ305 CSU Classical and neoclassical schools of criminology Type of Crime

In an essay, identify and explain two ways in which a particular type of crime (property, violent, or drug crime) can be explained using the Classical and Neoclassical schools of criminology.

Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length and conform to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Include at least two scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.

Rubric

CRJ305 Mod 3 CT

CRJ305 Mod 3 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all the required components, as specified in the essay assignment, either *Types of Crime* or *Situational Crime Prevention*.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources/Examples

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples do not meet required criteria and/or are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and well written, and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and/or is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 80.0

"Order a similar paper and get 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!"

Order Now