CRJ305 CSU Classical and neoclassical schools of criminology Type of Crime In an essay, identify and explain two ways in which a particular type of crime
CRJ305 CSU Classical and neoclassical schools of criminology Type of Crime
In an essay, identify and explain two ways in which a particular type of crime (property, violent, or drug crime) can be explained using the Classical and Neoclassical schools of criminology.
Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length and conform to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Include at least two scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.
Rubric
CRJ305 Mod 3 CT
CRJ305 Mod 3 CT
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all the required components, as specified in the essay assignment, either *Types of Crime* or *Situational Crime Prevention*.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources/Examples
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples do not meet required criteria and/or are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and well written, and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and/or is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 80.0
