CSU Global Biological and Psychological Theories in Violent Crime Essay BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORIES Compare and contrast how biological and psyc
CSU Global Biological and Psychological Theories in Violent Crime Essay BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORIES
Compare and contrast how biological and psychological theories can be used to explain violent crime. Provide one shortcoming or critique in the utilization of these theories for measures of crime reduction.
Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length and conform to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Include at least two scholarly references in addition to the course textbook.
Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all the required components, as specified in the reflective essay assignment.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Examples
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples do not meet required criteria and/or are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and well written, and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and/or is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 80.0
