Grand Canyon Wk 2 Process Requirements Prior Student’s Suspension Essay 500-750-word essay summarizing the due process requirements prior to a short-term a
Grand Canyon Wk 2 Process Requirements Prior Student’s Suspension Essay 500-750-word essay summarizing the due process requirements prior to a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student at that site. Are the due process procedures for a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student the same or different? Are these requirements consistent with Goss v. Lopez? Support your position with examples from case law, the U.S. Constitution, or other readings. I included the Rubric, the handbook. Do you want me to provide example for this assignment as well. Student Discipline and Due Process Due Date: Jun 27, 2018 23:59:59
Points: 100
Max
Review the school board policy and student handbook of a local public elementary or secondary school for information
regarding their policies on short- and long-term suspensions of students. You may also obtain this information by
interviewing an administrator at your chosen site.
Based on the information that you gather, write a 500-750-word essay summarizing the due process requirements prior
to a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student at that site. Are the due process procedures for a short-term
and a long-term suspension of a student the same or different? Are these requirements consistent with Goss v. Lopez?
Support your position with examples from case law, the U.S. Constitution, or other readings.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
Due Date: Jun 27, 2018 23:59:59
Max Points: 100
Details:
Review the school board policy and student handbook of a local public elementary or secondary school for information
regarding their policies on short- and long-term suspensions of students. You may also obtain this information by
interviewing an administrator at your chosen site.
Based on the information that you gather, write a 500-750-word essay summarizing the due process requirements prior
to a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student at that site. Are the due process procedures for a short-term
and a long-term suspension of a student the same or different? Are these requirements consistent with Goss v. Lopez?
Support your position with examples from case law, the U.S. Constitution, or other readings.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
Student Handbook and Discipline is on Page 37
Student Discipline
and Due Process Due Date.docx
look to page 37
Electronic Resource
1. Goss v. Lopez
Read “Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975),” from Nexis Uni.
https://advance-lexis-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/cases/id/3S4X-C590-003B-S4C9-0000000?cite=419%20U.S.%20565&context=1516831
2. Ingraham v. Wright
Read “Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977),” from Nexis Uni.
https://advance-lexis-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/api/document/collection/cases/id/3S4X-9GY0-003B-S2PX-0000000?cite=430%20U.S.%20651&context=1516831
3. Initial Course Survey
In an effort for continuous improvement, Grand Canyon University would like you to provide feedback about your experience with
the university. Your participation is appreciated. Click on the link to begin the survey.
http://survey.gcu.edu/initial_course_survey/initial_course_survey.htm?q0.a=20506308
4. Know Your Rights: A Manual for Arizona Public School Students
Read “Know Your Rights: A Manual for Arizona Public School Students,” from the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona.
http://www.acluaz.org/sites/default/files/documents/SRHFINAL.pdf
5. Legal Implications and the Handling of Discipline Problems in Schools
Read “Legal Implications and the Handling of Discipline Problems in Schools,” by Kritsonis, from National forum of Educational
Administration & Supervision Journal (2015).
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=103203340&site=edslive&scope=site
6. Search and Seizure, Due Process, and Public Schools
Read “Search and Seizure, Due Process, and Public Schools,” from the Center for Public Education (2006).
http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Public-education/The-law-and-its-influence-on-public-school-districts-Anoverview/Search-and-seizure-due-process-and-public-schools.html
7. Special Education Discipline: Suspensions and Expulsions
Read “Special Education Discipline: Suspensions and Expulsions,” from the Kidslegal.org website to prepare for Discussion Question 2
in this topic.
https://kidslegal.org/special-education-discipline-suspensions-and-expulsions
lectronic Resource
1. Constitution of the State of Arizona http://www.azleg.gov/const/arizona_constitution.pdf
2. Constitution of the United Stateshttp://constitutioncenter.org/media/files/constitution.pdf
3. Understanding the Arizona Constitution: 2012 Supplement
McClory, T. & McClory, T. (2013). Understanding the Arizona constitution: 2012 supplement (2nd ed.). Tucson, AZ:
University of Arizona Press.
https://uapress.arizona.edu/app/uploads/2017/11/McCloryAZconUpdate2011.pdf
Rubrics
Student Discipline and Due Process
5
Target Evidence
100.00%
100.0 %Category
30.0 %Summary of Due Process
Requirements
30.0 %Situation Context: School
policy regarding suspension
procedures as applied to Goss v.
Lopez
15.0 %Organization
10.0 %Research Citations
10.0 %Mechanics
5.0 %Paper Format: APA Style
Thoroughly summarizes school-suspension due process requirements
from the policy/handbook investigated.
Clear, well-crafted comparison of school suspension procedures and
Goss v. Lopez.
Purpose statement and related conclusion are clear and convincing.
Information is well organized and logical. Argument presents a
persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct.
Sources are credible. The documentation of cited sources is free of
error.
Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a
clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects welldeveloped use of practice and content-related language. Sentence
structures are varied and engaging.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment