HCM460 M2 CSU Establishing Strategic Leadership Team Scenario: You have been functioning in your COO role for several months and have a relatively solid un
HCM460 M2 CSU Establishing Strategic Leadership Team Scenario: You have been functioning in your COO role for several months and have a relatively solid understanding of the leadership styles present in the organization. The CEO has requested that you develop a strategic leadership team to design the new 5-year strategic plan for the organization. He would like you to assess the different styles of leadership present in the organization and how these styles would complement one another as a synergistic team. The CEO would also like you to search strategic leadership models present in other industries (e.g., business) and whether there are take-aways from these models that would be appropriate for the healthcare setting. Is transformational leadership the only effective leadership style? How do leadership styles complement one another? What leadership styles would be beneficial for the strategic leadership team?
Requirements:
The memo should be at least 1, but no more than 2 pages, single-spaced.
Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings.
You need to cite at least 3 sources for this assignment, outside of the textbook. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. is a great place to find resources. Your paper must be formatted according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
If you need assistance with your writing style, start with the links under the Research Help and Writing Help tabs on the CSU-Global Library’s homepage (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
HCM460 Mod 2 CT
HCM460 Mod 2 CT
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 75.0
