Leading Effective Teams Review the Harvard Business School reprint, Leading Teams. Consider the criteria for successful teams and the factors needed to ens

Leading Effective Teams Review the Harvard Business School reprint, Leading Teams. Consider the criteria for successful teams and the factors needed to ensure teams are structured for success.

Create a plan (750-1,000 words) describing the steps necessary to create more successful teams at various levels within your organization. Include the following in the plan:

Define the characteristics and structure of successful teams within your organization. How are independent teams vital to the success of your organization?

What are important factors to consider when leading teams within the various levels of the organization?
What factors are important to consider when leading teams at the executive level?
What aspects are essential in identifying appropriate members for teams and ensuring the teams are successfully launched?
What factors are important to ongoing team dynamics? Describe guidelines to evaluate the function and productivity of teams.
Compassion is a significant attribute of many religions and philosophies, including a Christian worldview, as well as being important for both authentic and servant leadership. As a leader, how would you empower your teams through compassion to honor diversity and support equality for all members as they work toward a common goal?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric (ATTACHED). Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

4 REFERENCE AND IN TEXT CITATION REQUIRED Course Code
LDR-600
Class Code
LDR-600-O101
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Definition of Characteristics and Structure of
Successful Teams Within Your Organization
10.0%
Explanation of How Independent Teams Are Vital
to the Success of Your Organization
10.0%
Description of Important Factors to Consider
When Leading Teams Within The Various Levels
of the Organization Including the Executive Level 10.0%
Description of Aspects Essential in Identifying the
Appropriate Members for a Team and Ensuring
the Team Is Successfully Launched
10.0%
Factors Important to Ongoing Team Dynamics
10.0%
Description of Evaluation Guidelines for Team
Function and Productivity
10.0%
Explanation of How You Would Empower Your
Teams Through Compassion to Honor Diversity
and Support Equality for All Members as They
Work Toward a Common Goal
10.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Creating and Leading Effective Teams
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient definition of
characteristics and structure of successful teams within your
organization. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or
irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Plan does not include an explanation of how independent
teams are vital to the success of your organization.
Plan does not include a description of important factors to
consider when leading teams within the various levels of the
organization including the executive level.
Plan does not include a description of aspects essential in
identifying the appropriate members for a team.
Plan does not include an explanation of factors important to
ongoing team dynamics.
Plan does not include a description of evaluation guidelines
for team function and productivity
Plan does not include an explanation of how you would
empower your teams through compassion to honor diversity
and support equality for all members as they work toward a
common goal.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
100.0
Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient definition of
characteristics and structure of successful teams within your
organization. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or
irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of
how independent teams are vital to the success of your
organization.
Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient description of
important factors to consider when leading teams within the
various levels of the organization, including the executive
level. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant.
Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient description of
aspects essential in identifying the appropriate members for a
team. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant.
Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation
factors important to ongoing team dynamics. Evidence to
justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is
unclear or inconsistent.
Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient description of
evaluation guidelines for team function and productivity.
Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject
knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Plan provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of
how you would empower your teams through compassion to
honor diversity and support equality for all members as they
work toward a common goal. Evidence to justify conclusions
is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or
inconsistent.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Plan provides an elemental definition of characteristics and
structure of successful teams within your organization. Some
subject knowledge is evident.
Plan provides an elemental definition of explanation of how
independent teams are vital to the success of your
organization. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Plan provides an elemental description of important factors
to consider when leading teams within the various levels of
the organization, including the executive level. Some subject
knowledge is evident.
Plan provides an elemental description of aspects essential in
identifying the appropriate members for a team. Some
subject knowledge is evident.
Plan provides an elemental explanation of factors important
to ongoing team dynamics. Some subject knowledge is
evident.
Plan provides an elemental description of evaluation
guidelines for team function and productivity. Some subject
knowledge is evident.
Plan provides an elemental explanation of how you would
empower your teams through compassion to honor diversity
and support equality for all members as they work toward a
common goal. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Plan provides a definition of characteristics and structure of
successful teams within your organization. Detailed examples
and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Plan provides an explanation of how independent teams are
vital to the success of your organization. Detailed examples
and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Plan provides a description of important factors to consider
when leading teams within the various levels of the
organization, including the executive level. Detailed examples
and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Plan provides a description of aspects essential in identifying
the appropriate members for a team. Detailed examples and
evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Plan provides an explanation of factors important to ongoing
team dynamics. Detailed examples and evidence are
included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Plan provides a description of evaluation guidelines for team
function and productivity. Detailed examples and evidence
are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Plan provides an explanation of how you would empower
your teams through compassion to honor diversity and
support equality for all members as they work toward a
common goal. Detailed examples and evidence are included.
Subject knowledge is competent.
Thesis is clear and forecast the development of the paper.
Thesis statement is descriptive and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed definition of
characteristics and structure of successful teams within your
organization. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable
insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge
and understanding.
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of
how independent teams are vital to the success of your
organization. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable
insight. Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge
and
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed description of
important factors to consider when leading teams within the
various levels of the organization, including the executive
level. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight.
Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and
understanding.
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed description of
aspects essential in identifying the appropriate members for a
team. Plan includes relevant examples and applicable insight.
Plan demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and
understanding.
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of
factors important to ongoing team dynamics. Plan includes
relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates
comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed description of
evaluation guidelines for team function and productivity. Plan
includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Plan
demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and
understanding.
Comments
Plan provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of
how you would empower your teams through compassion to
honor diversity and support equality for all members as they
work toward a common goal. Plan provides relevant
examples and applicable insight. Plan demonstrates
comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
Thesis is comprehensive. The essence of the paper is
contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the
purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment